DOI: https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v38i0.3991

Efectividad de las intervenciones para la transferencia y apropiación social del conocimiento de las guías de práctica clínica para pacientes y comunidad, una revisión sistemática

Nathaly Garzón-Orjuela, Javier Eslava-Schmalbach, Nathalie Ospina

Resumen


Introducción. Las intervenciones de transferencia y apropiación social del conocimiento contribuyen a una adecuada propagación del conocimiento, y podrían implementarse de manera rutinaria para mejorar el cumplimiento de las guías de práctica clínica.
Objetivo. Evaluar la efectividad de las intervenciones de transferencia y apropiación social del conocimiento de las guías de práctica clínica para mejorar su cumplimiento en los pacientes y la comunidad.
Materiales y métodos. Se hizo una revisión sistemática de las intervenciones de transferencia y apropiación social del conocimiento comparadas con las intervenciones clásicas en los pacientes y la comunidad. Se hizo una búsqueda hasta abril de 2017 en Medline (Ovid), Embase, ScopuS, Central (Ovid®), Web of Science, LILACS, Academic Search y Scielo. Dos evaluadores independientes calificaron el riesgo de sesgo y la calidad de la evidencia de los estudios incluidos.
Resultados. Se incluyeron ocho estudios. El cumplimiento de las recomendaciones se reportó en dos de ellos. Hubo una gran heterogeneidad en los estudios debido a la variabilidad en la población, el tipo de guía de práctica clínica y las herramientas de medición. El riesgo de sesgo fue alto: 60 % de sesgo de desempeño; 50 % de desgaste; 25 % de selección y reporte, y cerca de 15 % de detección. La calidad de la evidencia fue moderada para el cumplimiento y la mortalidad reportados. Las intervenciones que combinaban estrategias a cargo de grupos de profesionales de salud mejoraron algunos de los resultados clínicos en los pacientes (desviación media, DM=-3,00; IC95%: -6,08 a 0,08).
Conclusiones. En las intervenciones a corto plazo se evidenció un leve efecto a favor en el cumplimiento, y en las mixtas (para pacientes y profesionales), en algunos resultados clínicos. Sin embargo, se requieren nuevos estudios con menos heterogeneidad para confirmar estos resultados.


Palabras clave


guías de práctica clínica como asunto; transferencia de experiencia; conocimiento, pacientes; participación de la comunidad

Texto completo:

PDF HTML

Referencias


1. Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Care Services, Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.17226/13058
2. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458-65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.15.1458
3. Weisz G, Cambrosio A, Keating P, Knaapen L, Schlich T, Tournay VJ. The emergence of clinical practice guidelines. Milbank Q. 2007;85:691-727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00505.x
4. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Guideline Summaries Archive. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2017. Fecha de consulta: 8 de mayo de 2017. Disponible en: https://www.guideline.gov/summaries/archive
5. Prior M, Guerin M, Grimmer-Somers K. The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies - A synthesis of systematic review findings. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14:888-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01014.x
6. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ. 1998;317:465-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465
7. Agudelo M, Alejandro S. Apropiación social del conocimiento: una nueva dimensión de los archivos. Rev Interam Bibl. 2012;35:55-62.
8. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Guide to knowledge translation planning at CIHR: Integrated and end-of-grant approaches. CIHR. 2015. Fecha de consulta: 4 de mayo de 2017. Disponible en: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/45321.html
9. Ward V, House A, Hamer S. Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: A thematic analysis of the literature. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009;14:156-64. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120
10. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47
11. Jacobson N, Butterill D, Goering P. Development of a framework for knowledge translation: Understanding user context. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8:94-9. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581903321466067
12. Kitson AL, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: Theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-1
13. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
14. Maison P, Desamericq G, Hemery F, Elie N, Del’Volgo A, Dubois-Randé JL, et al. Relationship between recommended chronic heart failure treatments and mortality over 8 years in real-world conditions: A pharmacoepidemiological study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69:901-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-012-1400-9
15. Armstrong R, Waters E, Jackson N, Oliver S, Popay J, Shepherd J, et al. Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Version 2. Melbourne: Melbourne University: 2007.
16. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Vol. 4, The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Fecha de consulta: 8 de mayo de 2017. Disponible en: www.handbook.cochrane.org
17. Effective Practice and Organisation of Care. Interrupted time series ( ITS ) analyses. EPOC Resources for review authors. Vol. 13. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2013. p. 1-13.
18. Martin LR, Williams SL, Haskard KB, DiMatteo MR. The challenge of patient adherence. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2005;1:189-99.
19. Cochrane Public Health Group. Data Extraction and assessment template. 2011. Fecha de consulta: 8 de mayo de 2017. Disponible en: http://ph.cochrane.org/review-authors
20. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. GRADE Handbook. 2013. Fecha de consulta: 3 de octubre de 2017. Disponible en: http://gdt.guidelinedevelopment.org/app/handbook/handbook.html
21. Beune EJ, Moll Van Charante EP, Beem L, Mohrs J, Agyemang CO, Ogedegbe G, et al. Culturally adapted hypertension education (CAHE) to improve blood pressure control and treatment adherence in patients of African origin with uncontrolled hypertension: Cluster-randomized trial. PLoS One. 2014;9:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090103
22. Fan VS, Gaziano JM, Lew R, Bourbeau J, Adams SG,Leatherman S, et al. A comprehensive care management program to prevent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospitalizations: A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:673-83. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00003.
23. Brosseau L, Wells GA, Kenny GP, Reid R, Maetzel A, Tugwell P, et al. The implementation of a communitybased aerobic walking program for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis: A knowledge translation randomized controlled trial: Part II: Clinical outcomes. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1073 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-871
24. Brosseau L, Wells GA, Kenny GP, Reid R, Maetzel A, Tugwell P, et al. The implementation of a communitybased aerobic walking program for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA): A knowledge translation (KT) randomized controlled trial (RCT): Part I: The Uptake of the Ottawa Panel clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). BMC Public Health. 2012;12:871 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-871
25. Brosseau L, Lineker S, Bell M, Wells G, Casimiro L, Egan M, et al. People getting a grip on arthritis: A knowledge transfer strategy to empower patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Health Educ J. 2012;71:255-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896910387317
26. Thomson RG, Eccles MP, Steen IN, Greenaway J, Stobbart L, Murtagh MJ, et al. A patient decision aid to support shared decision-making on anti-thrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation: Randomised controlled trial. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2007;16:216-23. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.018481
27. Narayanaswami P, Gronseth G, Dubinsky R, Penfold-Murray R, Cox J, Bever C, et al. The impact of social media on dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines: A longitudinal observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e193. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4414
28. Svetkey LP, Pollak KI, Yancy WS, Dolor RJ, Batch BC, Samsa G, et al. Hypertension improvement project: Randomized trial of quality improvement for physicians and lifestyle modification for patients. Hypertension. 2009;54:1226-33. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.134874
29. Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Crichton N, Chandler J, Hawkes CA, Allen C, et al. A pragmatic cluster randomised trial evaluating three implementation interventions. Implement Sci. 2012;7:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-80
30. Smulders YM, Burgers JS, Scheltens T, van Hout BA, Wiersma T, Simoons ML, et al. Clinical practice guideline for cardiovascular risk management in the Netherlands. Neth J Med. 2008;66:169-74.
31. Westby M, Bullock I, Gray W, Lardner-Browne C, Rashid R. RCN/RCoA: Perioperative fasting in adults and children: Clinical Practice Guidelines. RCN Institute. London: Royal College of Nursing; 2005. Fecha de consulta: 30 de mayo de 2017. Disponible en: https://my.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/78678/002800.pdf
32. Loew L, Brosseau L, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Kenny GP, Reid R, et al. Ottawa panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for aerobic walking programs in the management of osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1269-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.024
33. The Management of COPD Working Group. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Outpatient Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Dis- ease. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs/U.S. Department of Defense; 2007. Fecha de consulta: 1 de abril de 2017. Disponible en: https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/CD/copd/copd_20.pdf
34. Scottish Inter-Collegiate Guidelines Network. Scottish Inter-Collegiate Guidelines Network Antithrombotic therapy: A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: Scottish Inter-Collegiate Guidelines Network; 1999. Fecha de consulta: 1 de abril de 2017. Disponible en: http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/129/
35. Loew L, Brosseau L, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Kenny GP, Reid R, et al. Ottawa Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic exercises and manual therapy in the management of osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. 2005;85:907-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/85.9.907
36. Brosseau L, Wells G, Tugwell P, Egan M, Dubouloz C-J, Casimiro L, et al. Ottawa panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic exercises in the management of rheumatoid arthritis in adults. Phys Ther. 2004;84:934-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/84.10.934.
37. Yadav V, Bever C, Bowen J, Bowling A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Cameron M, et al. Summary of evidencebased guideline: Complementary and alternative medicine in multiple sclerosis: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2014;82:1083-92. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000250
38. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206-52. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2
39. Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness, and care: Clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88:251-8.
40. Whitlock EP, Orleans CT, Pender N, Allan J. Evaluating primary care behavioral counseling interventions: An evidence-based approach. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:267-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181657e0d
41. Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A, et al. Ingredients for change: Revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.11.2.174
42. Flodgren G, Lo C, Mayhew A, Omar O, Cr P, Shepperd S. Interventions to improve professional adherence to guidelines for prevention of device-related infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD006559. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006559.pub2
43. Moulding N, Silagy C, Weller D. A framework for effective management of change in clinical practice: Dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Qual Heal Care. 1999;8:177-83.
44. Harrison MB, Legare F, Graham ID, Fervers B. Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E78-84. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081232
45. Licskai C, Sands T, Ong M, Paolatto L, Nicoletti I. Using a knowledge translation framework to implement asthma clinical practice guidelines in primary care. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2012;24:538-46 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzs043
46. Ospina MB, Taenzer P, Rashiq S, MacDermid JC, Carr E, Chojecki D, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of knowledge translation interventions for chronic noncancer pain management. Pain Res Manag. 2013;18:e129-41.
47. Ament SM, de Groot JJ, Maessen JM, Dirksen CD, van der Weijden T, Kleijnen J. Sustainability of professionals’ adherence to clinical practice guidelines in medical care: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008073 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008073
48. Schipper K, Bakker M, De Wit M, Ket JCF, Abma TA. Strategies for disseminating recommendations or guidelines to patients: A systematic review. Implement Sci. 2016;11:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0447-x
49. Acosta N, Pollard J, Mosquera P, Reveiz L. Equidad en el desarrollo de guías de práctica clínica. Rev Salud Pública. 2011;13:327-38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-
00642011000200014
50. Eslava-Schmalbach JH, Welch VA, Tugwell P, Amaya AC, Gaitán H, Mosquera P, et al. Incorporating equity issues into the development of Colombian clinical practice guidelines: Suggestions for the GRADE approach. Rev Salud Pública. 2016;18:72-81 https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v18n1.45002
51. Welch VA, Akl EA, Guyatt G, Pottie K, Eslava-Schmalbach J, Ansari MT, et al. GRADE Equity guidelines 1: Health equity in guideline development- introduction and rationale. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.014
52. Eslava-Schmalbach J, Sandoval-Vargas G, Mosquera P. Incorporating equity into developing and implementing for evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Rev Salud Pública. 2011;13:339-51. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642011000200015
53. Welch VA, Akl EA, Pottie K, Ansari MT, Briel M, Christensen R, et al. GRADE equity guidelines 3: Health equity considerations in rating the certainty of synthesized evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.015
54. Akl EA, Welch V, Pottie K, Eslava-Schmalbach J, Darzi A, Sola I, et al. GRADE Equity Guidelines 2: Considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: Equity extension of the Guideline Development Checklist. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.017
55. Pottie K, Welch V, Morton R, Akl EA, Eslava-Schmalbach JH, Katikireddi V, et al. GRADE equity guidelines 4: Guidance on how to assess and address health equity within the evidence to decision process. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.001


Métricas de artículo

Cargando métricas ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




Revista Biomédica -  https://doi.org/10.7705/issn.0120-4157
ISSN 0120-4157

Instituto Nacional de Salud
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD
Avenida Calle 26 No. 51-20
Apartado aéreo 80334 y 80080
Bogotá, D.C., Colombia, S.A.
Teléfono: 05712207700 Ext. 1386
Correo electrónico: biomedica@ins.gov.co